首页> 外文OA文献 >A phylogenetically controlled meta- analysis of biologging device effects on birds: Deleterious effects and a call for more standardized reporting of study data
【2h】

A phylogenetically controlled meta- analysis of biologging device effects on birds: Deleterious effects and a call for more standardized reporting of study data

机译:对鸟类的生物记录装置影响的系统发育控制的荟萃分析:有害影响并呼吁对研究数据进行更规范的报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of biologging devices continues to increase with technological advances yielding remarkable ecological insights and generating new research questions. However, as devices develop and are deployed more widely, there is a need to update our knowledge of the potential ethical impacts to allow scientists to balance these against the knowledge gained. We employed a suite of phylogenetically controlled meta-analyses on a dataset comprising more than 450 published effect sizes across 214 different studies to examine the effects of biologger tagging on five key traits in birds. Overall, we found small but significant negative effects of tagging on survival, reproduction, parental care. In addition, tagging was positively associated with foraging trip duration, but had no effect on body mass. Meta-regressions revealed that flying style, migration distance and proportional tag mass were significant influences producing these deleterious effects, with attachment type and position additionally important covariates influencing survival- and reproduction-based effect sizes. There was a positive correlation between the effects of tagging on survival and reproduction, highlighting that effects may be cumulative, with the full effects of tagging not necessarily apparent in studies focused on single traits. We discuss the tradeoff between these negative effects and the advances gained through the use of biologgers. Finally, given the number of studies from our initial literature search that lacked sufficient data for inclusion in analyses, we provide recommendations on the essential information that all biologging studies should report in order to facilitate future assessments of impacts on animals.
机译:随着技术的进步,生物记录设备的使用不断增加,产生了非凡的生态学见解并产生了新的研究问题。但是,随着设备的发展和更广泛的部署,有必要更新我们对潜在道德影响的知识,以使科学家能够将这些影响与获得的知识相平衡。我们在包括214个不同研究的450多种已公布效应大小的数据集上采用了一套系统发育控制的荟萃分析,以研究生物记录仪标签对鸟类5个关键性状的影响。总体而言,我们发现标签对生存,生殖,父母照料的影响很小但很明显。此外,标签与觅食行程持续时间呈正相关,但对体重没有影响。荟萃回归表明,飞行方式,迁移距离和比例标签质量是产生这些有害效应的重要影响因素,依附类型和位置另外重要的协变量也会影响基于生存和繁殖的效应量。标签对存活和繁殖的影响之间存在正相关关系,强调标签可能是累积性的,标签的全部影响在针对单一性状的研究中不一定很明显。我们讨论了这些负面影响与通过使用生物记录仪获得的进步之间的权衡。最后,鉴于我们最初的文献搜索缺乏足够的数据来进行分析,因此,我们为所有生物记录研究应报告的基本信息提供了建议,以利于将来对动物的影响进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号